The Power of Context
- Ask EASt
- Aug 14, 2024
- 2 min read

Example:
The 1967 Referendum and the 2023 Voice to Parliament Referendum
Imagine reading about the 1967 Australian Referendum, where over 90% of Australians voted "Yes" to amend the Constitution, and then jumping forward to the 2023 Voice to Parliament Referendum without understanding the historical context behind each.
The 1967 Referendum:
The Year: 1967, a time of significant social change and a growing movement for Indigenous rights.
The Outcome: A resounding "Yes" to include Indigenous Australians in the census and give the federal government the power to make laws for them, symbolizing a step towards greater equality.
The 2023 Voice to Parliament Referendum:
The Year: 2023, in a nation that has evolved but still grapples with the legacy of its colonial past.
The Proposal: To establish an Indigenous Voice to Parliament, a body that would advise on policies affecting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
The Outcome: Rejected by a majority of Australians, a decision that sparked widespread reflection on the country’s ongoing struggle with reconciliation and the complexities of national identity.
Connecting the Two Referendums:
Understanding the 1967 Referendum provides crucial context for interpreting the 2023 Voice to Parliament Referendum. While the 1967 vote was a clear step towards inclusion and recognition, the 2023 Referendum’s rejection reflects a more complicated reality. It underscores the challenges that remain in achieving true reconciliation and highlights differing views on how best to address the needs and rights of Indigenous Australians.
Why This Matters to Students:
By linking these two referendums, students can explore the ongoing narrative of Indigenous rights in Australia. They can critically assess how far the nation has come since 1967 and consider why, despite past progress, the 2023 proposal did not achieve the same consensus. This comparison encourages students to think deeply about the historical and current societal factors that shape national decisions, fostering a more nuanced understanding of Australian history and politics.
ความคิดเห็น